Quote:
Originally Posted by oldel
Haven't you ever played sim city. coal bad, gas better, nuclear dangerous, solar and wind best. Come on, we learnt that in the 90s, so catch up.
Seriously though, after Fukashima there's little appetite for nuclear, and even talking about it is a waste of time. It's only mentioned be people that want to stifle progress with real renewables. It's a stalling tactic.
If you said nuclear in the 90s, you would have a point. If some poli or person in the media brings it up now they're just time wasting as it takes so long to build, they're relics and dinosaurs not worthy of attention IMO.
|
no matter how safe
id rather be dealing with the waste from renewables than
night glow sticks nuclear
and i think if things did go wrong the cleanup is easier to work with
tho having said that im not in agreeance with tax incentives for ev's
not yet anyways lets fix our renewables situation for energy first and help people to get in to that then we can think of the things we run with the power made
and as oldel said like lpg if theres tax incentives then it need to be to get people in to vehicles not going to profits