View Single Post
Old 04-05-2013, 12:20 AM   #390
phillyc
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
phillyc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 3,246
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Always factual and beneficial. 
Default Re: 2014 Falcon Sneek Peak

Quote:
Originally Posted by Road_Warrior View Post
Yes way. The best (and only) time to can a vehicle that is in development is when it...err, is in development. Especially prior to the attribute mules and full build prototypes hitting the road, those cars believe it or not cost a fortune. A full build proto with all the calibration, monitoring and sensory gear fitted to it can run the manufacturer $1-1.5 million per car. Another consideration is the tooling and plant modifications, there is a crunch date for these as well and they would need to pull the pin prior to the award of design and construct contracts for the tooling and tenders for the equipment for any plant upgrades.
That's a really good explanation Road Warrior.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Road_Warrior View Post
The actual engineering and design costs for the car itself would be relatively small for this model, considering it is not an all-new car, more like a Mid Cycle Evolution or Mid Cycle Enhancement which invariably brings little change under the skin anyway (read: no changes to the expensive bits)
Well, I think that the IRS could very well be up for grabs! The Mustang is said to be getting a new IFS based on the virtual pivot FG Falcon assembly. The Mustang is for certain getting a new IRS. If and it's an IF, that IRS is adopted we can be confident a GRWD Falcon / Lincoln is a goer.
__________________
BA2 XR8 Rapid M6 Ute - Lid - Tint -18s
226.8rwkW@178kmh/537Nm@140kmh 1/9/2013
14.2@163kmh 23/10/2013

Boss349 built. Not yet run. Waiting on a shell.

Retrotech thread
http://www.fordforums.com.au/showthr...1363569&page=6
phillyc is offline   Reply With Quote
This user likes this post: