Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 23-06-2010, 02:50 PM   #211
platinumXR
IWCMOGTVM Club Supporter.
 
platinumXR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: CQ
Posts: 891
Default

Hmm...some interesting responses here. Most seem to advocate the "Attitude Adjustment" as being the most significant necessity and rightly so as the licensing / Registration system here in Australia has been in need of revamp for decades.

Driver Attitude and Etiquette are among the least of the concerns when time comes for examination and reward as the "system" inherently makes the incorrect assumption that everyone who applies for and is granted a license has an understanding of why they need to be tested and regulated in the first place.

Licensing and Regulation (as in Traffic Law Enforcement as an example) are there in an attempt to provide just that - Regulation, and not anarchy and chaos stemming from (some, not all) drivers being overconfident and or inadequately trained and therefore dangerous and liable as a consequence. There is a genuine need to get EVERYONE to understand that they have to SHARE the road and play well with others.

HAVING SAID THAT; as vehicle technology, advanced / defensive driver training and road construction technology all become more advanced / safer / available and above all more capable - I see no reason why certain speed limits could not be increased. As well, I believe that if a driver can prove themselves to be competent enough to drive at said limits then this should be reflected in a revamped and NATIONWIDE licensing system that also rewards good driver attitudes and behaviours. Academics will tell you otherwise because they are often bestowed grants by the people they are spruiking for.

Excessive and overgoverned road legislation and fine enforcement is not the answer and never has been, but it is the easiest and most politically and publicly appeasable system (or should I say anacronism) to implement. But, that also means that everyone needs to understand that some road rules and speed zones are necessary and must be vigorously enforced. School Zones as a case in point, but as others here have mentioned it is the Numpties that place the speed restriction rather that the necessary overhead walkbridge instead as it would be cheaper; that is the problem.

Just because you can drive at a certain speed, does not always mean that you should - this is often misunderstood and taken for granted. Speed itself does not kill - it's the lack of understanding of HOW to drive fast that is the danger.

And BRAZEN - yes now is the time. First step: fix the licensing / training. I have said it before and I'll say it again: I would feel a lot safer knowing the guy in the lane next to me is not a wombat and has a bit of an idea of what he/she is doing at 60, or 130 or 150.

Do it, do it now.
__________________


Toys:
2017.5 LZ Focus RS, Magnetic Grey my new pocket rocket
2008 BF2 RTV Ute
1993 EB2 S-XR8 Sedan, Platinum, manual (now sold)
1975 XB Fairmont GS Sedan, Tropic Gold...or Starlight Blue...not sure yet...(for sale now...PM me...)
platinumXR is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 23-06-2010, 05:43 PM   #212
max
LWBforME
 
max's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 373
Default

I see Monash Freeway is in the news a bit lately. Crashes for various reasons. Burnleigh Tunnel a while back. When I'm over from Adelaide every year, I am struck by the pace and heavy vehicle traffic mixed with passenger vehicles all hurtling along and weaving in and out of lanes on the Westgate Freeway. In countrytown Adelaide you don't see this kind of thing. My point is this: When something goes wrong on a Melbourne freeway, the result will in all probability be spectacular and catastrophic. The road accident stats reflect this. There is no margin for error on these kinds of motorways. Driver skills, mental agility, concentration, experience, vehicular roadworthiness, knowledge of the road and its varying conditions, patience and commonsense are some of the things that are a must for safe negotiation in this kind of traffic. Trouble is, at any time, any number of these pre-requisites are bound to be missing amongst road users. I see freeways as a permanent setting for disaster. Until uniform driver skills accreditation for all road users can be assured, and since that is virtually impossible, justification for allowing increased speed is simply absurd.
max is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 23-06-2010, 06:08 PM   #213
Brazen
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Brazen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,876
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by max
I see Monash Freeway is in the news a bit lately. Crashes for various reasons. Burnleigh Tunnel a while back. When I'm over from Adelaide every year, I am struck by the pace and heavy vehicle traffic mixed with passenger vehicles all hurtling along and weaving in and out of lanes on the Westgate Freeway. In countrytown Adelaide you don't see this kind of thing. My point is this: When something goes wrong on a Melbourne freeway, the result will in all probability be spectacular and catastrophic. The road accident stats reflect this. There is no margin for error on these kinds of motorways. Driver skills, mental agility, concentration, experience, vehicular roadworthiness, knowledge of the road and its varying conditions, patience and commonsense are some of the things that are a must for safe negotiation in this kind of traffic. Trouble is, at any time, any number of these pre-requisites are bound to be missing amongst road users. I see freeways as a permanent setting for disaster. Until uniform driver skills accreditation for all road users can be assured, and since that is virtually impossible, justification for allowing increased speed is simply absurd.
My argument is that limits should be increased to promote concentration, awareness, and patience on the road. The reason why accidents happen on freeways like this is because the slow speeds encourage complacence, frustration, and apathy.

Travelling around I have seen countries in which they have very strict licensing standards and countries with very very slack standards, the one thing which has struck me all these years is that the higher the traffic speed will mean higher concentration, better awareness and better the driving.

Coming back to Australia is like driving in slow motion, people trundle slowly along, they dont care, they make stupid mistakes and they dont apply any skill because the travelling speeds are well below what the conditions allow. And what do people do when they are undertaking a task well below their skill level? They zone out.

You could train people to race-car standard, but if the speed limits are still way below what the conditions allow you will still get people not concentrating, not paying attention, getting fatigued or zoning out.

It is not an attitude problem on the roads, its the conditions on the drivers themselves which are causing the problems.
Brazen is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 01:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL