Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > Club and Speciality Forums > Forum Community Car Clubs > AU Falcon.com.au

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 22-07-2009, 02:14 PM   #1
Dave_Obsession
Resident AFF detailer
 
Dave_Obsession's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Melbourne, VIC
Posts: 3,730
Technical Contributor: For members who share their technical expertise. - Issue reason: Helpful and detailed posts on car care. 
Default fuels and performance

Just an observation I've picked up on whilst driving around.....

Whilst my engine is stock (ie runs on regular 91RON unleaded), I have usually been running on BP Ultimate......I guess the videos on their site about the cleaning stuff in the petrol got to me....I want to keep my engine clean inside!!

Anyways, on the 98RON stuff, when accelerating, I can really feel the difference at 2500rpm when the engine just seems to pick up a lot in the higher rev band, right through to 4000rpm (is this when the stock cam seems to die out?).

Just filled it right up last night with the 91RON regular stuff, and the kick at 2500rpm is no longer there, it's more like a constant acceleration with no real noticable improvement at any level......

Does this mean that the car runs better and faster on the 98RON, even if everything is stock??

I don't know all the technical stuff to do with cams, timing and all that stuff......How would some of you more learned guys explain this in laymans terms???

__________________
No longer an 'active' detailer.
Dave_Obsession is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 22-07-2009, 02:41 PM   #2
blueoval
Critical Thinker
 
blueoval's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 20,283
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Well thought out and constructive posts.  A real credit to this forum. 
Default

Hey Dave,

I believe that when you put the better fuels in, the engine notices it and the ecu advances the timing a little to compensate for the better grade fuel.

i.e. Higher RON fuel, the more power you'll get, but only up to the limit of your engine mods.

Thats the way I see it, but Im sure someone here will explain it better than me.
__________________
"the greatest trick the devil pulled, is convincing the world he doesn't exist"

2022 Mazda CX5 GTSP Turbo

2018 Hyundai Santa Fe Highlander


1967 XR FALCON 500


Cars previously owned:
2021 Subaru Outback Sport
2018 Subaru XV-S
2012 Subaru Forester X
2007 Subaru Liberty GT
2001 AU2 75th Anniversary Futura
2001 Subaru GX wagon
1991 EB XR8
1977 XC Fairmont
1990 EA S Pak
1984 XE S Pak
1982 ZJ Fairlane
1983 XE Fairmont
1989 EA Falcon
1984 Datsun Bluebird Wagon
1975 Honda Civic
blueoval is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 22-07-2009, 02:53 PM   #3
Sox
RIP...
 
Sox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 15,524
Community Builder: In recognition of those who have helped build the AFF community. - Issue reason: As recommended by Ropcher. Personifies the spirit of AFF. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blueoval
Hey Dave,

I believe that when you put the better fuels in, the engine notices it and the ecu advances the timing a little to compensate for the better grade fuel.

i.e. Higher RON fuel, the more power you'll get, but only up to the limit of your engine mods.

Thats the way I see it, but Im sure someone here will explain it better than me.
That's pretty much what happens in basic terms, yes.
The ECU follows a timing map, however when it registers detonation via the knock sensor it will retard the timing by a certain amount (4deg I believe) until the detonations stops. After a very short time has passed (literally seconds), it will read direct from the map again.

That's also why, as you already mentioned, performance will only increase up to a certain point.
I believe that pont is actually 95 with the AU Falcons.
IME, 98 fuels have no performance advantage over 95 on AU's with mostly standard and even mildly modified engines.
IME 91 has caused very minor detonation and as a consequence slight retardation of timing under heavy load. Particularly in hot weather and when the throttle is snapped open quickly.

It's only once you have a cam and increased compression that 98 is an advantage.
__________________
.
Oval Everywhere...
Sox is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 22-07-2009, 04:07 PM   #4
Mr Hardware
Flairs - Truckers Delight
 
Mr Hardware's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Brisbane Northside Likes: Opposite Lock
Posts: 5,731
Tech Writer: Recognition for the technical writers of AFF - Issue reason: The excellent how to on LPG jet cleaning. 
Default

orly sox
95 hey
that's excellent information.
__________________
Current: Silhouette Black 2007 SY Ford Territory TX RWD 7-seater "Black Banger"
2006-2016: Regency Red 2000 AUII Ford Falcon Forte Automatic Sedan Tickford LPG "Millennium Falcon"
Mr Hardware is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 23-07-2009, 02:02 AM   #5
Dave_Obsession
Resident AFF detailer
 
Dave_Obsession's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Melbourne, VIC
Posts: 3,730
Technical Contributor: For members who share their technical expertise. - Issue reason: Helpful and detailed posts on car care. 
Default

Thanks Sox, great info there!

will have to run this tank of 91 down to empty, then fill her up with 95 and see what happens!

Am I right about the stock cam running out of guts around the 4000rpm mark?
__________________
No longer an 'active' detailer.
Dave_Obsession is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 23-07-2009, 09:20 AM   #6
Sox
RIP...
 
Sox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 15,524
Community Builder: In recognition of those who have helped build the AFF community. - Issue reason: As recommended by Ropcher. Personifies the spirit of AFF. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dave93761
Thanks Sox, great info there!

will have to run this tank of 91 down to empty, then fill her up with 95 and see what happens!

Am I right about the stock cam running out of guts around the 4000rpm mark?
I haven't noticed any significant power losses, however as I mentioned I have detected some detonation so obviously some power will be lost.
4000rpm is close to where the inlet manifiold changes from long to short runners, so the timing map is also changing at that point (actually 3800rpm).
I'm not sure if the ignition timing is increased or decreased at the 3800rpm.
If it's increased it stands to reason that you might experience some power loss if the advance is too much for the 91 fuel.

BTW, when this detonation occurs, you should be able to hear a slight rattling noise for a split second (until the ECU has pullled our some timing).
If you don't hear anything, then it's possible nothing is happening at all and you might be imagining it.
__________________
.
Oval Everywhere...
Sox is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 23-07-2009, 10:39 PM   #7
mik
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
mik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Melb north
Posts: 12,025
Default

engine compressions have a bareing on the fuel type for each engine. low compression engines tolerate cheaper fuels(lower octane) as a rule, the higher the cylander pressure the more the fuel wants to burn faster and explode in the cylander, uncontrolled burning ,exploding fuels becomes ie pinking (or pinging) sending shockwaves through the rotating mass shortening the life of your engine, pistons ,rods,crank bearings etc hence the need for slower burning fuels (higher octane) for higher compression performance engines.
mik is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-07-2009, 01:07 AM   #8
Dave_Obsession
Resident AFF detailer
 
Dave_Obsession's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Melbourne, VIC
Posts: 3,730
Technical Contributor: For members who share their technical expertise. - Issue reason: Helpful and detailed posts on car care. 
Default

So....you're saying my engine will actually last longer as well by using higher octane fuel???
__________________
No longer an 'active' detailer.
Dave_Obsession is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-07-2009, 08:38 AM   #9
Dave_Obsession
Resident AFF detailer
 
Dave_Obsession's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Melbourne, VIC
Posts: 3,730
Technical Contributor: For members who share their technical expertise. - Issue reason: Helpful and detailed posts on car care. 
Default

how does 95RON ethanol fuel fit into this???
__________________
No longer an 'active' detailer.
Dave_Obsession is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-07-2009, 01:30 PM   #10
Sox
RIP...
 
Sox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 15,524
Community Builder: In recognition of those who have helped build the AFF community. - Issue reason: As recommended by Ropcher. Personifies the spirit of AFF. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dave93761
So....you're saying my engine will actually last longer as well by using higher octane fuel???
Well, detonation isn't a good thing, so yes.
Quote:
how does 95RON ethanol fuel fit into this???
Much the same as normal 95, except that it won't go quite as far for the same amount.
But it's a lot cheaper, so the worse economy is offset.

I can't say I'm sure of the long term effects, but I doubt it would be a problem.
__________________
.
Oval Everywhere...
Sox is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-07-2009, 10:50 PM   #11
BoostedT
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 56
Default

Runs BP Ultimate and only that .. AU's run better on Higher RON Fuel
BoostedT is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 06-08-2009, 03:52 AM   #12
Dave_Obsession
Resident AFF detailer
 
Dave_Obsession's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Melbourne, VIC
Posts: 3,730
Technical Contributor: For members who share their technical expertise. - Issue reason: Helpful and detailed posts on car care. 
Default

**UPDATE**

Last week - ran my tank almost bone dry and filled up on BP 95RON premium unleaded......the 'kick' in acceleration at around 2500rpm was back, everything went nicely......went for a drive out to Yarra Glen over the weekend, felt pretty responsive!

Tonight, got home about 12:30 and wasn't tired, so decided to go for a drive around the suburbs to run my tank dry before going back to filling up with BP Utimate (98RON) to see if there was any noticeable difference.......managed to get pulled over by a cop who reckoned one of my headlights was too bright, so I showed him high beam vs low beam and he couldn't say anything..............ANYWAYS...

There was definately a difference going fron 95 to 98RON petrol, even the shortish drive from the BP servo to home, I pushed the car and the 'kick' that I could feel is even more pronounced with the 98RON fuel.

Have generally been running on it as of late, but definately going to stick to it from now on - will have to give Shell V-Power and the Mobil a go as well, but BP Ultimate is just plain good.

Might also try out the 98RON ethanol fuel you can get from United servos....see what the difference is!!!
__________________
No longer an 'active' detailer.
Dave_Obsession is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 06-08-2009, 11:12 AM   #13
blueoval
Critical Thinker
 
blueoval's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 20,283
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Well thought out and constructive posts.  A real credit to this forum. 
Default

this is a good little comparison Dave. Im keen to see what you find.

Generally there isnt a massive difference on an NA untuned car between 95 & 98 fuels. But if you can notice a difference, then that is something.

Running on the more cleaner refined fuels should give you better economy also.
__________________
"the greatest trick the devil pulled, is convincing the world he doesn't exist"

2022 Mazda CX5 GTSP Turbo

2018 Hyundai Santa Fe Highlander


1967 XR FALCON 500


Cars previously owned:
2021 Subaru Outback Sport
2018 Subaru XV-S
2012 Subaru Forester X
2007 Subaru Liberty GT
2001 AU2 75th Anniversary Futura
2001 Subaru GX wagon
1991 EB XR8
1977 XC Fairmont
1990 EA S Pak
1984 XE S Pak
1982 ZJ Fairlane
1983 XE Fairmont
1989 EA Falcon
1984 Datsun Bluebird Wagon
1975 Honda Civic
blueoval is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 06-08-2009, 11:25 AM   #14
Dave_Obsession
Resident AFF detailer
 
Dave_Obsession's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Melbourne, VIC
Posts: 3,730
Technical Contributor: For members who share their technical expertise. - Issue reason: Helpful and detailed posts on car care. 
Default

No worries mate, yeah I'm not saying the difference from 95-98RON was huge, but it was definately there - it felt that little bit more responsive, and the engine just revved out that little bit easier!
__________________
No longer an 'active' detailer.
Dave_Obsession is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 06-08-2009, 02:31 PM   #15
Stattic
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Stattic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,566
Default

v-power is miles better than vortex but id still give bp ultimate the edge
__________________
Current
Blueprint 03 xr8
5 speed manual, Difilippo Quad Big Boy system, BPR CAI, BPR Custom tune, Underdrives
256rwkw

BA manual Typhoon
Fully optioned, 340rwkw@16psi (thanks Bluepower)!


The old ride....
AU Fairmont, cammed beast, R.I.P you made my p plate years bearable!
150.8rwkw courtesy BPR
Stattic is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 06:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL